BC double wall vs AC double wall: side-by-side numbers

AC double wall is 22% thicker than BC double wall (0.344 vs 0.281 in nominal). At the same ECT, the McKee formula rates a AC double wall box 11% stronger in compression; the trade is in size, crush resistance and print surface.

Side by side

AC double wall is 0.063 in thicker than BC double wall. On a 12 × 10 × 8 in box that makes the outside 0.13 in longer and wider and 0.19 in deeper, and at the same ECT the McKee estimate for BC double wall is 90% of the AC double wall figure.

BC double wallAC double wall
Wallsdoubledouble
Nominal caliper, in0.28130.3438
Flutes per foot——
OD added to L and W, in0.5630.688
OD added to depth, in0.8441.031
McKee strength index, same ECT5358.6

Same box, both boards

Inside, inBCT at 44 ECT, BCBCT at 44 ECT, ACBoxes per pallet, BCBoxes per pallet, AC
10 × 8 × 6822909119119
16 × 12 × 101,0251,1334032
24 × 18 × 181,2551,38866

44 ECT is used on both sides only to isolate thickness; in practice the two boards are made to different grades. Pallet: 48 × 40, loaded to 60 in, column stacked.

Where each fits

BC double wall

  • Nearly twice the caliper of C, so much stronger in McKee at the same ECT
  • Heavier and bulkier: more board weight and larger outside dimensions
  • The B ply on one face gives a better print or wear surface

AC double wall

  • Highest McKee estimate of the double walls at the same ECT
  • Bulky: outside dimensions grow fastest
  • Availability depends on plants running A flute

More comparisons

Sources